By Peter Pressman, M.D., About.com Guide
Updated July 01, 2013
About.com Health's Disease and Condition content is reviewed by the Medical Review Board
See More About
To be diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, a person needs two main things. First, they must have symptoms of parkinsonism: a combination of tremor, rigidity, slow movements (bradykinesia), and balance problems (postural instability). Many diseases can cause parkinsonism, which is why there is a need for a second requirement. Parkinson's disease must respond to increased levels of dopamine.
Dopamine is a neurotransmitter secreted from the substantia nigra, a small region in thebrainstem that withers away in Parkinson's disease. As natural dopamine levels in the brain begin to fall, signs of Parkinson's disease appear. If dopamine is replaced, many of the symptoms improve.
One would think, then, that dopamine should be given as soon as possible. There are other options, though. In addition to given dopamine directly (a drug called carbidopa-levodopa), Parkinson's disease patients may benefit from a class of drugs called dopamine agonists. These are drugs that aren't dopamine, but have similar effects in the nervous system. Some physicians have argued that dopamine agonists should be used earlier in the disease course, and that only elderly patients with at least moderate disability should receive levodopa.
Arguments for Early Levodopa Use
Levodopa is the most effective medication there is to treat Parkinson's symptoms. That said, it is not without side effects.
One of the fears of levodopa use is that it can cause excessive movement called dyskinesia. People with dyskinesia have a writhing movement that is out of their control. While it looks uncomfortable, however, most with dyskinesia prefer it to parkinsonism, and studies suggest that dyskinesia ultimately doesn't have much an impact on quality of life.
Some researchers have suggested that dopamine may actually accelerate the disease course while patching over the symptoms. More research has not supported this view, however.
Symptoms may fluctuate while on dopamine, meaning there may be times of the day where tremor, rigidity, and slow movements are less well controlled than others. On the other hand, it's unclear how those fluctuations actually impact quality of life. Furthermore, people on other medications like dopamine agonists may also eventually have fluctuations.
Other arguments in support of early use of levodopa is that it will improve quality of life early in the disease course, the importance of which has not been given sufficient attention. Levodopa is also considerably less expensive than dopamine agonists.
Drug companies are no longer promoting the use of levodopa because there are so many generic forms. In other words, there are financial motivators for pharmaceutical companies to promote the use of other, more expensive medications early in Parkinson's disease, rather than relying on the old, tried-and-true levodopa, and this may influence the choices of prescribing physicians.
Arguments Against Early Levodopa Use
Few will argue about the superior effectiveness of levodopa, and all Parkinson's patients will likely eventually need this medication. There are some persuasive arguments for starting it later in the disease course, though.
Medications need to be titrated throughout the progression of a disease. Someone with mild Parkinson's disease who is started on levodopa will need the medication to be steadily increased as their disease worsens. In general, dopamine's potency will wear off after three years. When maximum doses of levodopa no longer control the symptoms, what else is there to turn to? Without stronger medicinal options, surgery may be the only recourse. Isn't it better to save the "big gun" for later, when symptoms are more severe?
In addition to the side effects of levodopa already discussed, there are additional potential complications including worsening cognitive function, psychosis, and diminished impulse control. It's true, though, that other medications such as dopamine agonists also have side effects, such as edema, somnolence and psychiatric side effects such as gambling addiction.
Another option would be to start a medication such as a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. An example is rasagiline, which seems to be very helpful when started early. Some studies have even suggested that rasagiline may slow neurological deterioration in addition to controlling symptoms, those these studies are very controversial. This is in contrast to dopamine, in which some early studies have suggested disease worsening with the drug.
In short, why would you use your "big gun" early, especially when past researchers (even if they've since been contradicted) have suggested it can make the disease worse? Especially when you can use a milder medication that might actually slow the disease process in addition to helping with symptoms?
Conflict Resolution:
How can these two viewpoints be reconciled? Ultimately, there is no one medication regimen that fits everyone. People are different, and need individually tailored medications. One potential approach might be to start with a medication like rasagiline, followed by a lower dose of levodopa. As the disease progresses, a dopamine agonist could be added, followed by a high dose of levodopa. Ultimately, though, the best approach will vary both based on the patient's unique needs and the physician's preference regarding different medications.
Sources:
Fonte: Neurology.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Observamos que muitos comentários são postados e não exibidos. Certifique-se que seu comentário foi postado com a alteração da expressão "Nenhum comentário" no rodapé. Antes de reenviar faça um refresh. Se ainda não postado (alterado o n.o), use o quadro MENSAGENS da coluna da direita. Grato.